We are a Nationwide Law Firm

Finch McCranie LLP
For a FREE CONSULTATION call
Toll Free 1.866.443.4624
Toll Free 1.800.228.9159

FREE CASE REVIEW

Please read our Disclaimer.

The New IRS Whistleblower Program:
Whistleblower Rewards Double for Tax Whistleblower Claims
By Michael A. Sullivan
Finch McCranie, LLP
msullivan@finchmccranie.com


Before December 2006, the Internal Revenue Service had no effective program to encourage whistleblowers to report tax fraud and tax violations. Rewards to "IRS Whistleblowers" were rare, slow, discretionary, and small--and typically could not exceed 15 percent of the amount recovered by the IRS.  As a result, the "old" program was ineffective--even though the IRS historically has made good use of information from informants.


The new IRS Whistleblower Program provides the first meaningful rewards to whistleblowers who report substantial tax violations when at least $2 million is owed to the IRS. The amended IRS Whistleblower statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7623, doubles the rewards available to 15-30% of the government's recovery, and for the first time creates an enforceable right for the whistleblower to receive a reward. Not only taxes, but also interest and penalties, count in calculating the whistleblower’s reward.


Many challenges nonetheless remain in representing IRS Whistleblowers. Perhaps the greatest is convincing an overburdened IRS that your client's case is worth the investment of its limited resources. The IRS already has many other cases awaiting investigation, and would-be whistleblowers continually add to that "pile" by submitting hundreds of other potential cases.


Background--Why Now?

The new IRS Whistleblower rewards were inspired by another whistleblower statute, the federal False Claims Act. The successes of the False Claims Act over the past two decades convinced Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and others in Congress that meaningful whistleblower rewards are an effective tool for the government to recover public dollars obtained by fraud. Since the False Claims Act was amended in 1986 to increase the size of rewards and otherwise encourage "qui tam" lawsuits that expose fraud against the government, the federal government's fraud recoveries have grown dramatically--from less than $100 million in 1987, to more than $3 billion in 2006.


Tax violations, however, fall outside the False Claims Act, which expressly “does not apply to claims, records, or statements made under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.” 31 U.S.C. § 3729(e). As a result, there was no meaningful incentive for tax whistleblowers to come forward to the IRS before December 2006.


With a "tax gap" of more than $200 billion in estimated unpaid taxes each year, the old IRS program brought in less than $100 million annually--even though information from "insiders" historically has been quite productive for the IRS. In fact, the June 2006 Report of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) noted that, based on past experience, "examinations initiated based on informant information were often more efficient and effective." (See June 2006 Report of Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, "The Informants Rewards Program Needs More Centralized Management Oversight,"  No. 2006-30-092. (http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2006reports/200630092fr.pdf).


  Rewards under the "old" version of 26 U.S.C. § 7623 were small--zero to 15%--and were left entirely to the IRS's discretion. The IRS Whistleblower thus had no "right" to receive any reward at all, under the former version of the statute. In practice, the average payout was less than $24,000.


Further, there was no "Director" or even any "Whistleblower Office" under the old program--no one person or centralized place to keep track of informant submissions, or to decide on rewards. There was a risk that claims would simply fall through the cracks and be lost. In addition, claims took an average of seven and one-half years to be resolved.


Because the taxpayer privacy provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 6103 limit what IRS officials can say about their investigations, over seven years whistleblowers might wonder if their claims had been forgotten.


Moreover, many potential IRS Whistleblowers never knew that rewards were possible, as the rewards were not well-publicized. All of these facts made the "old" program ineffective, when compared with how successful the False Claims Act has been since meaningful rewards became available through its 1986 amendments.

The New IRS Whistleblower Program Is Born

With the 2006 Report of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration in hand to document the need for an improved IRS Whistleblower program, Congress amended 26 U.S.C. § 7623, effective December 20, 2006. This IRS Whistleblower statute is linked here. (http://www.whistleblowerlawyerblog.com/2007/01/new_irs_whistleblower_reward_s_2.html).
            The new IRS Whistleblower Program’s major provisions include the following:
            1.         Whistleblowers who report tax liability of at least $2 million (including penalties, interest, additions to tax, and any additional amounts) now have an enforceable "right" to part of the government's recovery;
            2.         The reward range has doubled to 15 to 30% of the government's recovery;
            3.         For the first time, the IRS has a "Whistleblower Office" and a Director, Stephen Whitlock, to coordinate whistleblower claims and make determinations about rewards;
            4.         The whistleblower may appeal the IRS's reward determination to the U.S. Tax Court;
            5.         If the taxpayer is an individual, the new rewards apply only if the individual's gross income exceeds $200,000, and there is at least $2 million in tax   liability (including penalties, interest, additions to tax, and                          any additional amounts);
            6.         Even persons who participated in the tax violations may qualify for the increased rewards so long as they did not "plan" and "initiate" the actions  in question;
            7.         If the tax liability does not meet the $2 million threshold, the IRS may still make a "discretionary" reward to the whistleblower.
            There are certain exceptions and alternative reward provisions in the statute, some of which are similar to those of the False Claims Act.


The New IRS Whistleblower Program Continues to Develop

As claims under the new version of the IRS Whistleblower statute began to arrive, the IRS in February 2007 announced the first-ever Director of the new Whistleblower Office, Stephen Whitlock.


On December 19, 2007, the eve of the first anniversary of the new IRS Whistleblower Program, the IRS issued its interim "guidance" on filing tax whistleblower claims, linked here.  (http://www.whistleblowerlawyerblog.com/2007/12/irs_whistleblower_instructions.html.) These interim procedures have addressed many questions that lawyers were asking informally of the IRS in pursuing claims during the new program's first year. The IRS also issued a revised Form 211, which much be submitted under oath with each claim (also attached and linked here). (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f211.pdf).


Since then, the IRS has issued various notices and temporary regulations on issues that arise in whistleblower claims. These include temporary regulations addressing how the IRS can share information with whistleblowers and their attorneys under written contracts with the IRS (also attached here and published at 26 C.F.R. § 301.6103(n)-2T), and advice from the IRS Chief Counsel on contacts with informants (also attached and linked here). A more complete "running" account of these IRS announcements can be found at http://www.whistleblowerlawyerblog.com/irs_rewards_program_tax/.


Practical Observations for "Screening" and Pursuing IRS Whistleblower Claims

Although I have promised not to quote IRS officials, the following practical observations can be made based on time spent in discussions (and panel discussions) with senior IRS officials:


Screening Cases: Counsel can help perform a valuable "screening" function for the IRS by selecting only those claims that are likely to be worth the IRS's time in investigating and pursuing. Although the IRS seeks a "presence" in essentially all industries and income levels, obviously claims of greater dollar amounts (well above the $2 million threshold for the new rewards) should attract more attention. Currently, some examples of particular interest to the IRS apparently include high net worth taxpayers and abuses in tax shelters, hedge funds, and offshore schemes.


"Willful" tax violations also appear to be a priority, and willful conduct may extend the statute of limitations and allow the IRS to recover greater amounts. In our experience, the IRS Criminal Investigative Division is not hesitant about pursuing tax fraud and tax evasion.


Nonetheless, the Whistleblower Office also is interested in cases that do not necessarily involve fraud (which has a high standard of mens rea or intent), but concern tax "noncompliance," especially when substantial amounts of money are involved.


"Industry-wide" practices are also of interest to the IRS. It may be possible to support a greater reward if the IRS recovers from more than one entity in a given industry.


Evidence required: As to what information and evidence the whistleblower must present, "stories" are not enough. The IRS prefers claims with specific documents to prove the violation. Although the whistleblower does not necessarily have to be an "insider," it is preferable for the whistleblower to have direct knowledge of the violation.


In our view, submissions should include not only the verified Form 211, but also a detailed summary of the facts and supporting evidence from the informant (through counsel), supporting documents, and a list of witnesses or people involved, including their contact information.


If the whistleblower lacks certain documents that will prove the violation, it is important to describe with specificity those documents to the IRS, and as much as possible provide a "road map" for the IRS to follow in its investigation. Counsel and experts who analyze the legal elements of the violation and are prepared to discuss with the IRS how the violations may be proved are extremely helpful in this process--and may make the difference in whether the IRS pursues the matter.


For whistleblowers who participated in the violations, the threshold question for counsel is whether they "planned and initiated" the actions involved. If so, the statute places them in a lower reward category of no more than 10% (although they receive nothing if they are convicted of criminal conduct arising from this role), as described in 26 U.S.C. § 7623(b)(3). Nonetheless, based on our experience, the IRS is very interested in obtaining information about criminal conduct from "insiders" who may have played a role in the violation, and it may be possible to negotiate an agreement that protects the whistleblower from certain repercussions from the government.


Confidentiality: "Confidentiality" of the whistleblower's identity is addressed in section 3.06 of the interim "guidance" that is attached and linked here. (http://www.whistleblowerlawyerblog.com/2007/12/irs_whistleblower_instructions.html#more.)  Many whistleblowers are encouraged by the language that "[t]he Service will protect the identity of the claimant to the fullest extent permitted by law. Under some circumstances, such as when the claimant is needed as a witness in a judicial proceeding, it may not be possible to pursue the investigation or examination without revealing the claimant’s identity. The Service will make every effort to inform the claimant before proceeding in such a case."


Thus, unlike qui tam cases under the False Claims Act, claims under the IRS Whistleblower Program do not necessarily lead to anyone else's discovering that there has been a report by a whistleblower. Nonetheless, consistent with the caveats of that section, we believe it is important to recognize that the identity may become known, especially if a criminal prosecution of the taxpayer results and proceeds toward trial.


Process: Successful IRS Whistleblower claims must first pass a "screening" by the Whistleblower Office staff, whom we have found to be extremely capable and professional. The matter then is assigned to be investigated by the appropriate persons within the IRS. The Whistleblower Office will track all claims and will ultimately make a determination of any reward to the whistleblower, subject to the whistleblower's right of appeal to the U.S. Tax Court.


Although the new IRS Whistleblower Program promises to be dramatically more effective that the "old" program, IRS Whistleblower claims still will usually take several years to be resolved.

  



Posted On: January 26, 2007 by Finch McCranie, LLP
New IRS Whistleblower Rewards Statute
We hear from many lawyers and clients that they are not aware of the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program. The new provisions took effect on December 20, 2006, and yet so far they are hard to locate on the web.  Here is the amended version of the statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7623:
26 U.S.C. § 7623 Expenses of detection of underpayments and fraud, etc.
(a)        In general.--The Secretary, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, is authorized to pay such sums as he deems necessary for--
(1)        detecting underpayments of tax, or
(2)        detecting and bringing to trial and punishment persons guilty of violating the internal revenue laws or conniving at the same, in cases where such expenses are not otherwise provided for by law. Any amount payable under the preceding sentence shall be paid from the proceeds of amounts collected by reason of the information provided, and any amount so collected shall be available for such payments.
(b)        Awards to whistleblowers.--
(1)        In general.--If the Secretary proceeds with any administrative or judicial action described in subsection (a) based on information brought to the Secretary's attention by an individual, such individual shall, subject to paragraph (2), receive as an award at least 15 percent but not more than 30 percent of the collected proceeds (including penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts) resulting from the action (including any related actions) or from any settlement in response to such action. The determination of the amount of such award by the Whistleblower Office shall depend upon the extent to which the individual substantially contributed to such action.
(2)        Award in case of less substantial contribution.—
(A)       In general.--In the event the action described in paragraph (1) is one which the Whistleblower Office determines to be based principally on disclosures of specific allegations (other than information provided by the individual described in paragraph (1)) resulting from a judicial or administrative hearing, from a governmental report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, the Whistleblower Office may award such sums as it considers appropriate, but in no case more than 10 percent of the collected proceeds (including penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts) resulting from the action (including any related actions) or from any settlement in response to such action, taking into account the significance of the individual's information and the role of such individual and any legal representative of such individual in contributing to such action.
(B)       Nonapplication of paragraph where individual is original source of information.--Subparagraph (A) shall not apply if the information resulting in the initiation of the action described in paragraph (1) was originally provided by the individual described in paragraph (1).
(3)        Reduction in or denial of award.--If the Whistleblower Office determines that the claim for an award under paragraph (1) or (2) is brought by an individual who planned and initiated the actions that led to the underpayment of tax or actions described in subsection (a)(2), then the Whistleblower Office may appropriately reduce such award. If such individual is convicted of criminal conduct arising from the role described in the preceding sentence, the Whistleblower Office shall deny any award.
(4)        Appeal of award determination.--Any determination regarding an award under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) may, within 30 days of such determination, be appealed to the Tax Court (and the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction with respect to such matter).
(5)        Application of this subsection.--This subsection shall apply with respect to any action—
(A)       against any taxpayer, but in the case of any individual, only if such individual's gross income exceeds $200,000 for any taxable year subject to such action, and
(B)       if the tax, penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts in dispute exceed $2,000,000.
(6)        Additional rules.—
(A)       No contract necessary.--No contract with the Internal Revenue Service is necessary for any individual to receive an award under this subsection.
(B)       Representation.--Any individual described in paragraph (1) or (2) may be represented by counsel.
(C)       Submission of information.--No award may be made under this subsection based on information submitted to the Secretary unless such information is submitted under penalty of perjury.
[NOTE: These changes became law on Dec. 20, 2006, by Pub. L. 109-432, Div. A, Title IV, § 406(a)(1), 120 Stat. 2958.]
Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post
Posted In: IRS Whistleblower REWARDS (Taxes) , NEWS , Recent Developments



Posted On: December 19, 2007 by Finch McCranie, LLP
IRS Whistleblower Office Issues Long-Awaited Guidance for Tax Whistleblower Claims
Our whistleblower lawyer blog has followed closely the evolution of the new IRS Whistleblower Program, which celebrates its one-year anniversary on December 20, 2007. Late today, on the eve of that anniversary, the new IRS Whistleblower Office issued long-awaited interim "guidance" for filing Tax Whistleblower claims--which should help tax whistleblowers and their attorneys.
Until now, whistleblower lawyers and their clients had to learn the procedures from reports of various public statements and discussions with IRS officials. I had the pleasure of getting to know how the IRS Whistleblower Office's Director Stephen Whitlock intends to approach these claims, through appearing on a panel discussion with him in September in Washington to explain how the new IRS Whistleblower Program operates.
This interim guidance appears in IRS Notice 2008-4. The IRS is soliciting comments, and much discussion undoubtedly will follow, both on our whistleblower lawyer blog and elsewhere.  It is reprinted below:

Part III – Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Claims Submitted to the IRS Whistleblower Office under Section 7623
Notice 2008-4

SECTION 1. PURPOSE

This Notice provides guidance to the public on how to file claims under Internal Revenue Code section 7623 as amended by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-432 (120 Stat. 2958) (the Act) enacted on December 20, 2006.


SECTION 2. BACKGROUND

Section 406 of the Act amended section 7623 of the Internal Revenue Code concerning the payment of awards to certain persons who detect underpayments of tax.  Prior statutory authority to pay awards at the discretion of the Secretary was re-designated as section 7623(a), and a new section 7623(b) was added to the Code.  Additional provisions in section 406 of the Act establish a Whistleblower Office within the IRS and address reward program administration issues. These provisions were not incorporated into the Code.

The award program authorized by section 7623(a) has been previously implemented through regulations appearing at section 301.7623-1 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, the substance of which is reprinted as IRS Publication 733, with additional administrative guidance appearing in the Internal Revenue Manual.  Those regulations and Internal Revenue Manual provisions will continue to be followed for award claims within the scope of section 7623(a), except to the extent Sections 3.02 and 3.03 of this Notice provides interim guidance regarding submissions of information under section 7623(a).  New section 7623(b) requires that awards be made for submissions meeting certain criteria. Individuals are eligible for section 7623(b) awards based on the amount collected as a result of any administrative or judicial action resulting from the information provided. Because new section 7623(b) includes several requirements that are inconsistent with existing regulations and administrative guidance applicable to award claims under section 7623(a), the regulations which appear at section 301.7623-1 will not apply to the new award program authorized by section 7623(b). This Notice provides interim guidance applicable to award claims submitted under the authority of section 7623(b). In addition, this Notice seeks public comment on the topics covered herein.


SECTION 3. INTERIM GUIDANCE


3.01 Eligibility Requirements to Submit Claims Under Section 7623(b) 

To be eligible for an award under section 7623(b), the tax, penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts in dispute must exceed in the aggregate $2,000,000 and, if the allegedly noncompliant person is an individual, the individual’s gross income must exceed $200,000 for any taxable year at issue in a claim. If the thresholds in section 7623(b) are not met, section 7623(a) authorizes, but does not require, the Service to pay for information relating to violations of the internal revenue laws that result in the government’s recovery of tax. Submissions that do not qualify under section 7623(b) will be processed under section 7623(a). Unlike payments made on claims under section 7623(b), there is no requirement that payments made on claims 3 under section 7623(a) be subject to the statutory award percentages. The United States Tax Court appeal provisions added by the Act and codified in section 7623(b)(4) are applicable exclusively to award claims under section 7623(b). Accordingly, there is no right to appeal to the Tax Court for claims under section 7623(a).  3.02.


Submission of Information for Award under Sections 7623(a) or (b)
(1) Individuals submitting information under section 7623(a) or (b) must complete IRS Form 211, Application for Award for Original Information (available on www.irs.gov) and send the completed Form 211 to:
Internal Revenue Service
Whistleblower Office
SE:WO
1111Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, D.C. 20224

(2) All claims for awards must be submitted under penalty of perjury in accordance with section 3.03(9) below.  Until further guidance is issued, claims for awards may not be submitted electronically or by fax.


3.03 Information to be Included with IRS Form 211

The Form 211 must be completed in its entirety and should include the following information:
(1)        The date the claimant submits the claim;
(2)        Claimant’s name;
(3)        Name of claimant’s spouse (if applicable);
(4)        Claimant’s contact information, including address with zip code and telephone number;
(5)        Claimant’s date of birth;
(6)        Claimant’s Taxpayer Identification Number (e.g., Social Security Number or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number) and Taxpayer Identification Number of claimant’s spouse, if applicable.
(7)        Specific and credible information concerning the person(s) that the claimant believes have failed to comply with tax laws and which will lead to the collection of unpaid taxes. This information should include the following:
(i)         The legal name of the person(s) (e.g., individual or entity), and any related person(s), that committed the violation of tax laws;
(ii)        The person’s aliases, if any;
(iii)       The person’s address;
(iv)       The person’s Taxpayer Identification Number(s);
(v)        A description of the amount(s) and tax year(s) of Federal tax claimed to be owed, and facts supporting the basis for the amount(s) claimed to be owed;
(vi)       Documentation to substantiate the claim (e.g., financial data; the location of bank accounts, assets, books, and records; transaction documents or analyses relevant to the claim); and
(vii)      Any and all other facts and information pertaining to the claim.
If available information is not provided by the claimant, the claimant bears the risk that such information may not be considered by the Whistleblower Office in making any award determination. If documents or supporting evidence are known to the claimant but are not in his or her possession or control, the claimant should describe these documents and identify their location to the best of his or her ability.
(8)        Explanation of how the information that forms the basis of the claim came to the attention of the claimant, including the date(s) on which this information was acquired, and a complete description of the claimant’s present or former relationship (if any) to the person that is the subject of the claim (e.g., family member, acquaintance, client, employee, accountant, lawyer, bookkeeper, customer). If the claimant identifies multiple person(s) as the subject of a claim, describe his or her relationship to each person.
(9)        Information submitted under section 7623 must be accompanied by an original signed declaration under penalty of perjury, as follows:
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that I have examined this application and my accompanying statement and supporting documentation and aver that such application is true, correct and complete, to the best of my knowledge.  The requirement to submit information under penalty of perjury precludes submissions by: (1) a person serving as a representative of the claimant, or (2) an entity other than a natural person. With respect to claims under section 7623(b), the requirement to submit information under penalty of perjury precludes submissions made anonymously or under an alias.
(10)      Joint claims must be signed by each claimant and each claimant must sign the claim under penalty of perjury as described in 3.03(8).


3.04 Examples of Grounds for not Processing Claims Under Section 7623(b)

Examples of claims that will not be processed under section 7623(b) include:
(1)        Claims submitted by an individual who is an employee of the Department of Treasury, or who is acting within the scope of his/her duties as an employee of any Federal, State, or local Government.
(2)        Claims submitted by an individual who is required by Federal law or regulation to disclose the information, or by an individual who is precluded by Federal law or regulation from making the disclosure.
(3)        Claims submitted by an individual who obtained or was furnished the information while acting in an official capacity as a member of a State body or commission having access to such materials as Federal returns, copies or abstracts.
(4)        Claims submitted by an individual who had access to taxpayer information arising out of a contract with the Federal government that forms the basis of the claim.
(5)        Claims that upon initial review have no merit or that lack sufficient specific and credible information.
(6)        Claims submitted anonymously or under an alias.
(7)        Claims filed by a person other than a natural person (such as a corporation or a partnership).
(8)        The alleged noncompliant person is an individual whose gross income is below $200,000 for all taxable years at issue in a claim.


3.05 Acknowledgment of Claim by Whistleblower Office

The Whistleblower Office will acknowledge receipt of a claim in writing. If required information has not been submitted on a Form 211, the Whistleblower Office may return a Form 211 to the claimant for completion and submission. Following submission of the claim, the Whistleblower Office may, in its sole discretion, offer the opportunity to confer with the claimant to discuss the claim to ensure that the Service fully understands the information submitted with the claim. The Whistleblower Office, in its sole discretion, may ask for additional assistance from the claimant or any legal representative of such individual. Any assistance shall be under the direction and control of the Whistleblower Office or the office assigned to investigate the matter. The submission of a claim does not create an agency relationship between the claimant and the Federal Government, nor does the claimant act in any way on behalf of the Federal Government.


3.06 Confidentiality of Claimant’s Identity

The Service will protect the identity of the claimant to the fullest extent permitted by law. Under some circumstances, such as when the claimant is needed as a witness in a judicial proceeding, it may not be possible to pursue the investigation or examination without revealing the claimant’s identity. The Service will make every effort to inform the claimant before proceeding in such a case.


3.07 IRS Process for Evaluating Claim

The process for evaluating a claim is initiated by Service consideration of the information provided by the claimant in light of the facts developed by the Service in investigating the claim. This process will also consider whether the information submitted by the claimant resulted in administrative action taken by the Service or judicial action. For example, in the case of large entities where the entities’ tax returns are subject to annual examination by the Service, an administrative action can mean the creation of a new issue under the Audit Plan or a change in the way information about an issue is collected or analyzed, which would not otherwise have occurred without the information provided by the claimant. In other cases, an administrative action may include initiating an examination of the person which would not otherwise have occurred without information provided by the claimant. Alternatively, a claimant’s description of
information when the alleged noncompliant person is already under investigation and when the information results in no change in the manner regarding how the issue is approached or resolved would not generally be regarded as resulting in administrative or judicial action and therefore would not be eligible for an award.


3.08 Duration of Process from Submitted Claim to Award Determination

The process, from submission of complete information to the Service until the proceeds that serve as the basis for any award determination are collected, may take several years. Accordingly, the Service is unable to make any commitment to the claimant concerning the expected duration of the process.  Payment of awards will not be made until there is a final determination of the tax liability (including taxes, penalties, interest, additions to tax and additional amounts) owed to the Service and such amounts have been collected by the Service.


Examples of when a final determination of tax liability can be made include, but are not limited to: (1) at the administrative level, when the Service and person that is the subject of the claimant’s allegations enter into a closing agreement which conclusively waives the right to appeal or otherwise challenge a deficiency or additional tax liability determined by the Service; (2) if the person that is the subject of the claimant’s allegations petitions the United States Tax Court for a redetermination of a deficiency, when the decision in that case becomes final within the meaning of section 7481; and (3) after the expiration of the statutory period for a taxpayer to file a claim for refund and to file a refund suit based on that claim against the United States or, if a refund suit is filed, when the judgment in that suit becomes final. In a case in which litigation is commenced, any award consideration will be delayed until that litigation has been concluded with finality.


3.09 Percentages Applied to Awards Under 7623(b)

The Whistleblower Office will make the final determination whether an award will be paid and the amount of the award for claims which it processes. Awards will be paid in proportion to the value of information furnished voluntarily with respect to proceeds collected, including penalties, interest, additions to tax and additional amounts. The amount of the award will be at least 15% but no more than 30% of the collected proceeds in cases in which the Service determines that the information submitted by the claimant substantially contributed to the Service’s detection and recovery of tax. If the claimant planned and initiated the actions that led to the underpayment of tax, or to the violation of the internal revenue laws, the Whistleblower Office may reduce the award.  If the claimant is convicted of criminal conduct arising from his or her role in planning and initiating the action, the Whistleblower Office will deny the claim.


If an action is based principally on allegations resulting from judicial or administrative proceedings, government reports, hearing, audit, or investigation, or the media, an award of a lesser amount, subject to the discretion of the Whistleblower Office, may be provided; such an award, however, may not exceed 10% of the collected proceeds, including penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts resulting from the action. This reduction in award percentage does not apply if the Service determines that the claimant was the initial source of the information that resulted in the judicial or administrative proceedings, government reports, hearing, audit, or investigation, or the media’s report on the allegations.


3.10 Tax Treatment of Awards

All awards will be subject to current federal tax reporting and withholding requirements. Award recipients will receive a Form 1099 or such other form as may be proscribed by law, regulation or publication.


3.11 Appeal Rights

When the Whistleblower Office has made a final determination regarding a claim, the Whistleblower Office will send correspondence to the claimant regarding its final award determination. Final Whistleblower Office determinations regarding awards under section 7623(b) may, within 30 days of such determination, be appealed to the United States Tax Court. In accordance with section 7623(b)(4), decisions under section 7623(a) may not be appealed to the Tax Court.


3.12 Claims Submitted Prior to Date of Enactment of the Act

Information provided prior to December 20, 2006 (the date of enactment of the Act) is covered by the law and policies in place at the time the information was submitted. Supplemental information provided on or after December 20, 2006, will not be considered a new claim unless its receipt prompts the Service to take an administrative or judicial action that would not otherwise have been taken on the basis of the earlier-supplied information alone.


3.13 Additional Questions

An electronic mailbox for email inquiries has been set up and may be accessed.



Posted On: March 10, 2008 by Finch McCranie, LLP
IRS Tax Whistleblower Progress Continues with IRS Chief Counsel's Advice on Informant Contacts

The new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program continues to take shape, as the IRS's Chief Counsel has advised IRS employees on the contacts they may have with certain whistleblowers or "informants." The new IRS Whistleblower Program for tax whistleblowers has brought together a team of extremely qualified professionals at the IRS, and has provided them the legal means to create an effective whistleblower program. This Notice (CC-2008-011) addresses what contacts IRS employees may have with (1) informants with information about their current employer; and (2) informants who act as a taxpayer's representative in an IRS examination or other IRS matter.


The IRS's dealings with whistleblower or informants can present sensitive issues of privilege and confidentiality of information, as our whistleblower lawyer blog has discussed previously (and as discussed in a panel discussion last Fall with IRS Whistleblower Office Director Stephen Whitlock.)


This Notice from the IRS Chief Counsel's Office recognizes the need to protect "privilege issues that may be present when an informant is a current employee and/or the taxpayer's representative. It should be assumed that a current employee or a taxpayer's representative has access to information that may be privileged and there has been no affirmative waiver by the taxpayer of applicable privileges. The use of potentially privileged information by the Service can also have the same effect of tainting an issue or an entire case."


The IRS Notice reiterates the "one-bite" rule that permits the government to use information from a private party, "even if the private party obtained the information in an illicit or illegal manner as long as the government is a passive recipient of the information and did not encourage or acquiesce in the private party's conduct."  This "one-bite" rule is derived from a 1921 Supreme Court decision, Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921).


In the same Notice, the IRS Chief Counsel also has emphasized that the IRS will not allow the taxpayer's representative in an IRS proceeding to provide information as an informant, for obvious reasons: "Any information provided by the taxpayer's representative in connection with an overture to become an informant cannot be used by Service or Counsel employees in any matter concerning the taxpayer (or related taxpayers). It will be the responsibility of the informant to attempt to explain the reason for being excluded from the matter as the taxpayer's representative under these circumstances. In addition, Service and Counsel employees should have no further dealings or contact with, or receive any further information from, the informant as an informant."
The IRS notice appears at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-ccdm/cc-2008-011.pdf.
Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post Posted In:
IRS Whistleblower REWARDS (Taxes)  


Posted On: March 27, 2008 by Finch McCranie, LLP
IRS Whistleblower Program for Tax Whistleblowers: IRS Announces Sharing of Information with Whistleblowers and Their Attorneys Under Written Contracts

The IRS this week announced another interesting development in its new IRS Whistleblower Program, which this whistleblower lawyer blog has followed closely. This announcement addressed new regulations permitting the IRS to share tax return information with whistleblowers and their lawyers under written contracts with the IRS, and also to advise those whistleblowers and their attorneys about the status of their whistleblower claims.


On March 25, 2008, the IRS announced new, temporary regulations permitting "disclosure of [tax] return information . . . to a whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of the whistleblower, to the extent necessary in connection with a written contract among the IRS, the whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of the whistleblower, for services relating to the detection of violations of the internal revenue laws or related statutes." If return information is disclosed to the whistleblower and the whistleblower's attorney under such an agreement, the information must be kept confidential. It "may not be disclosed or otherwise used by the whistleblower or a legal representative of a whistleblower, except as expressly authorized by the IRS."


How much the IRS may communicate with whistleblowers, and still fulfill legal requirements about privacy of taxpayers' returns, has been an interesting topic of discussion since the new IRS Whistleblower Program was created in December 2006. We look forward to discussing the new provisions with the very capable IRS officials who administer the new Whistleblower Program.
The new temporary regulations may be found at 26 C.F.R. § 301.6103(n)-2T. 

They are reprinted below:

301.6103(n)-2T Disclosure of Return Information in Connection with Written Contracts Among the IRS, and Legal Representatives of Whistleblowers (Temporary)

(a)        General rule.
(1)        Pursuant to the provisions of sections 6103(n) and 7623 of the Internal Revenue Code and subject to the conditions of this section, an officer or employee of the Treasury Department is authorized to disclose return information (as defined in section 6103(b)(2)) to a whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of the whistleblower, to the extent necessary in connection with a written contract among the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of the whistleblower, for services relating to the detection of violations of the internal revenue laws or related statutes.

(2)        The Commissioner shall have the discretion to determine whether to enter into a written contract pursuant to section 7623 with the whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of the whistleblower for services described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

(b)       Limitations
(1)        Disclosure of return information in connection with a written contract for services described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be made only to the extent the IRS deems it necessary in connection with the reasonable or proper performance of the contract. Disclosures may include, but are not limited to, disclosures to accomplish properly any purpose or activity of the nature described in section 6103(k)(6) and the regulations thereunder.
(2)        If the IRS determines that the services of a whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of the whistleblower, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section can be performed reasonably or properly by disclosure of only parts or portions of return information, then only the parts or portions of the return information shall be disclosed.
(3)        Upon written request by a whistleblower, or a legal representative of a whistleblower, with whom the IRS has entered into a written contract for services as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Director of the Whistleblower Office, or designee of the Director, may inform the whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of the whistleblower, of the status of the whistleblower's claim for award under section 7623, including whether the claim is being evaluated for potential investigative action, or is pending due to an ongoing examination, appeal, collection action, or litigation. The information may be disclosed only if the Commissioner determines that the disclosure would not seriously impair Federal tax administration.
(4)        Return information disclosed to a whistleblower and, if applicable, a legal representative of a whistleblower, under this section, shall not be disclosed or otherwise used by the whistleblower or a legal representative of a whistleblower, except as expressly authorized in writing by the Director of the Whistleblower Office.

(c)        Penalties

Any whistleblower, or legal representative of a whistleblower, who receives return information under this section, is subject to the civil and criminal penalty provisions of sections 7431, 7213, and 7213A for the unauthorized inspection or disclosure of the return information.
(d)       Safeguards
(1)       Any whistleblower,or the legal representative of a whistleblower, who receives return information under this section, shall comply with all applicable conditions and requirements as the IRS may prescribe from time to time (prescribed requirements) for the purposes of protecting the confidentiality of the return information and preventing any disclosure or inspection of the return information in a manner not authorized by this section.
(2)        Any written contract for services as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall provide that any whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of a whistleblower, who has access to return information under this section, shall comply with the prescribed requirements.
(3)        Any whistleblower,or the legal representative of a whistleblower, who may receive return information under this section, shall agree in writing, before any disclosure of return information is made, to permit an inspection of his or her premises by the IRS relative to the maintenance of the return information disclosed under these regulations and, upon completion of services as described in the written contract with the IRS, to dispose of all return information by returning the return information, including any and all copies or notes made, to the IRS, or to the extent that it cannot be returned, by destroying the information in a manner consistent with security guidelines and other safeguards for protecting return information in guidance published by the IRS.
|(4)        If the IRS determines that any whistleblower, or the legal representative of a whistleblower, who has access to return information under this section, has failed to, or does not, satisfy the prescribed requirements, the IRS, using the procedures described in the regulations under section 6103(p)(7), may take any action it deems necessary to ensure that the prescribed requirements are or will be satisfied, including--
(i)         Suspension of further disclosures of return information by the IRS to the whistleblower and, if applicable, the legal representative of the whistleblower, until the IRS determines that the conditions and requirements have been or will be satisfied; and
(ii)        Suspension or termination of any duty or obligation arising

under a contract with the IRS.

(e)        Definitions --For purposes of this section—
(1)        The term Treasury Department includes the IRS and the Office of the Chief Counsel for the IRS.
(2)        The term whistleblower means an individual who provides

information to the IRS regarding violations of the tax laws or

related statutes and submits a claim for an award under section

7623 with respect to the information.

 

(3)        The term legal representative means any individual who is a member in good standing in the bar of the highest court of any state, possession, territory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia, and who has a written power of attorney executed by the whistleblower.

(f)        Effective/applicability date

This section is applicable on March 25, 2008.

(g)        Expiration date
            This section will expire on March 24, 2011.
26 C.F.R. § 301.6103(n)-2T
Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post
Posted In: IRS Whistleblower REWARDS (Taxes) , NEWS , Recent Developments


 

 

BACK TO HOME

Copyright © 2009 Finch McCranie LLP - All rights reserved - Disclaimer

Finch MCranie, LLP - Georgia Injury Lawyers - Qui Tam Litigation - Workers' Compensation Lawyers - Serious Injury Lawyers
Product Liability Lawyers - Los Abogados

Designed by Marketing Holdings